Steel vs concrete support structures for solar panel installations

Steel and concrete are commonly used for solar panel support structures because of their high strength-to-weight ratio and durability. Steel structures are often prefabricated, allowing for quick installation and transportability. Concrete is robust and can withstand harsh environmental conditions and heavy loads, providing stability and longevity to solar panel installations. Concrete is made of cement, aggregates, and water. Cement is produced by grinding limestone, clay, and minerals and heating them at high temperatures in a kiln.

Solar ballasts are concrete block mounts for solar arrays. Unlike traditional installation methods, which require drilling and cutting into a home's roof or the ground to attach mounts directly, solar ballasts secure arrays without penetrating surfaces. These ballasts protect solar arrays from shifting and lifting off during windy conditions.

This feature is particularly beneficial for flat-top and low-sloped roofs, which lack adequate drainage systems and are thus more susceptible to water damage if holes become unsealed. Moreover, concrete ballasts enable solar array installations in challenging environments such as wet or moist areas and landfill sites, expanding the possibilities for utilising otherwise unusable land for renewable energy generation.

Steel support structures

• Strength and durability: steel can support heavy loads over long periods and withstand harsh weather conditions, which is crucial for solar installations in various Indian regions.

• Ease of installation: steel structures are often prefabricated, making them more accessible and quicker to install than concrete. This can reduce labour costs and shorten project timelines. Want more in-depth articles like this? Register and never miss an update!

• Flexibility: steel structures can be designed with various configurations to accommodate different types of solar panels and site conditions. They can also be easily modified or expanded if needed.

• Maintenance: steel structures generally require less maintenance than concrete. They are less susceptible to cracking and degradation over time.
  

Concrete support structures

• Stability: concrete provides excellent stability and can be particularly advantageous for ground-mounted solar installations in areas prone to soil erosion or shifting ground conditions. It offers a solid foundation for supporting solar arrays.

• Longevity: adequately designed and constructed concrete structures can have a long lifespan with minimal maintenance. They are less susceptible to corrosion and degradation than some steel structures, especially in corrosive environments.

• Fire resistance: concrete is inherently fire-resistant, which can be essential in areas prone to wildfires.

• Cost: concrete structures may have higher initial material costs than steel structures. Additionally, they can be more challenging and time-consuming to install due to the need for formwork and curing time, potentially increasing project costs.

• Thermal mass: concrete has high thermal mass, which means it can absorb heat from the sun when it's hot and release it when it's cold. This helps stabilise the area around solar panels, as they work best when not too hot or cold.
  

The choice between steel and concrete support structures for solar panel installations depends on project location, site conditions, budget, and specific project requirements. Steel is often preferred for its strength, flexibility, and ease of installation, while concrete offers stability, longevity, and fire resistance advantages. Ultimately, carefully considering these factors is essential to determine the most suitable option for each project. Enjoyed this post? Register for more expert insights on solar installations!